Stage 3 · Saadia Gaon (882–942)

Emunot v'Deot: III:5 · The Prophet's Own Certainty

כתאב אלאמאנאת ואלאעתקאדאת — The Book of Beliefs and Opinions

Emunot v'Deot in the original Judeo-Arabic, with a working English translation by Eliyahu Freedman (working draft). Hover a phrase to see its English light up; tap any word for a gloss.

Layers
Pageקכז

Aligned sentence by sentence

. .

Section 5. I have established that the messenger could verify for himself that the speech he heard was from God, before attributing it to his Lord before his people.

, , , ,

This verification came through a sign that appeared at the beginning of the speech and ceased at its end — either a pillar of fire, or a pillar of cloud, or a brilliant light unlike the familiar luminaries.

,

When the prophet witnessed this, he was certain the speech was from God. And sometimes the people witnessed it too.

As Moses' people — when he departed from them toward the place of revelation — would rise and look toward the sky. It would be clear of all cloud, their eyes fixed on Moses,

,

— and when he arrived at the place of revelation, the cloud descended like a pillar and remained until the address was complete, then rose again. Then he returned to them.

Pageקכח

Aligned sentence by sentence

?, ,

If one asks: how did the magicians counter Moses' signs? — we say: the signs he performed were ten, the staff-turning and the nine others,

,

and the Torah records that they countered him only in three. And even those three the Torah does not record in order to equate them with him —

, ,

— rather, it recorded it to contrast his act with theirs. It made clear that Moses did something open and manifest, as God commanded, while they did something hidden and concealed.

[ ] ,

when uncovered, the trick became apparent, as it says about the three: 'The sorcerers did likewise with their secret arts' (Exod. 7:22). That word in the language denotes purely the hidden, covered, and wrapped thing,

— so when the Torah used the expression 'with their secret arts,' it made clear that this was to refute them, not to validate them.

Having established this principle, I need not specify in detail how they may have used trickery with small portions of the water and altered its color by dye,

,

— except that such tricks cannot apply to large bodies of matter. What Moses did was to change the entirety of the Nile — estimated at forty parasangs in length —

Pageקכט

Aligned sentence by sentence

,

— all of it, in which no trick or subtlety is possible; rather, it is the act of the Almighty, the Wise, the Powerful, as it says: 'To Him who alone does great wonders, for His steadfast love endures forever' (Ps. 136:4).

?

Another question: how was Jonah chosen for the mission yet fled from it, given that the Wise One does not choose someone who would defy Him?

,

I say: I have examined the story of Jonah carefully. I find no text that explicitly states he did not discharge the first mission; yet neither do I find that he discharged it.

,

Yet I hold it obligatory to believe this on the model of all messengers, and on the principle that the Wise One does not choose someone who would not discharge His mission.

, ,

Rather, Jonah fled from the possibility of being sent again — for he reasoned that the first mission was warning, and a second would be threatening and warning of punishment, and he feared that if he warned them they would repent, the threat would pass, and he would be attributed with falsehood.

,

So he left the city where the Creator had promised the prophecy would occur. He was not blameworthy, for his Lord had not told him 'I am sending you a second time.'

English is a working draft — alignment is sentence-by-sentence.